- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 13,705
- Reaction score
- 13,835
There's no actual debate here.
A jury found him guilty and they had access to a hell of a lot more detail than we are. A lunatic politician (Abbott's list of insane act is pretty long) pardoned him because he knew it would play with his base. That politician's hand picked committee rubber stamped his pardon because they serve at his pleasure (he can fire and hire them at will) and do what he wants one hundred percent of the time. You're defending the pardon because you're a partisan hack and it was a progressive activist who was killed.
No debate.
If the BLM activist had been behind the wheel and had shot the racist scumbag to death exactly the same way, and was then pardoned, you'd scream bloody murder that progressives always get off Scot-Free.
I agree, there is no debate. The previous DA investigated along with 2 other law enforcement agencies and elected not to charge Perry. When the Soros DA bought his way in to the position, he RE-opened the case, and now the lead detective has come forward admitting the Soros DA coerced him to keep exculpatory evidence from the grand jury in order to get charges against Perry.
Perry never should’ve been charged for defending himself.