- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 32,484
- Reaction score
- 18,750
Not really. My house cost (13 years ago): 210K. Current evaluation: 250K. I could sell it for 400K.
Off to fuckin jail you go!
Not really. My house cost (13 years ago): 210K. Current evaluation: 250K. I could sell it for 400K.
I like the subtle "No true Scotsman" irony of the defense of Stewart.
The entire claim of D.A. James' case was that Trump was overvaluing his properties, versus the tax assessed value to gain loans from banks, who if the banks did their due diligence would counter and negotiate a fair deal. Which they did, And the loan's repayments were satisfied. Trump would naturally try and suppress the property values when assessors put a value on the home to save on taxes.
But this IS just what almost every homeowner does when Selling a home. They try to maximize their asking price, while asking the assessors to lower their home/property value for tax purposes. Just like in Stewart's case.
If someone asking price is too high and they lower it, are they suddenly committing fraud because no one will buy it at the initial asking price? short answer, no.
This is the whole reason why Governor Hochul had to bullshit the public on local media to calm everyone from flipping out and bailing on the state. A lot of people see this as a gray area that could land them in court. Including some of her DNC donors who use the 'borrow and pay back' method as a means of bypassing capitol gains and income taxes.
The whole but "That's different!!" argument is just you defending your team(tribalism) when they get egg on their face.
The final "No True Scotsman" irony, is that Jon Stewart is just a stage name, which is a Scottish surname. But the reality is that Jon Leibowitz is Jewish.
It's really not, though. Trump fraudulently inflated the value of his assets in order to materially benefit. Stewart just sold an apartment, and he got a good price. That's not conceptually similar at all.
Not versus the tax-assessed value; versus economic reality. In all cases of fraud, the victims potentially could have identified it in advance if they did more work, but that doesn't excuse fraud.
We don't even know what Stewart's asking price was. We know that the property sold for what it sold for. There was no fraud even alleged and no purpose for which fraud would be served (i.e., he didn't misrepresent his asset values to anyone to gain credit or anything similar to what Trump did).
Correct. Irrelevant to all aspects of his discussion, but that is true.
What Hochul said is that contrary to what others were saying, Trump's behavior was not typical, and people who didn't commit fraud have nothing to worry about. The tribalism here is trying to pretend that just because Stewart dared criticize the chief, he must have done something wrong himself. And not sure what you're on about with him being Jewish. It's not something he has hidden or has any reason to hide, and not something that is relevant to anything here. Bringing it up here makes you sound really creepy.
Not really. My house cost (13 years ago): 210K. Current evaluation: 250K. I could sell it for 400K.
Something about being (D)ifferent.we see a lot of these..
...yet not one explanation.
What was Stewart’s fraud? Lol……chuds ITT mad about the jon stewart analogy and demand common sense.....can't explain or justify the case against trump.
I guess you could argue that he defrauded the tax payers by not reporting the improvements he made to the property to the tax assessor's office.What was Stewart’s fraud? Lol……
What evidence do you have that Stewart didn’t follow administrative rules on the work he did on his properties?I guess you could argue that he defrauded the tax payers by not reporting the improvements he made to the property to the tax assessor's office.
I don't see where Trump or Stewart did anything illegal. But what's good for the goose and all......
Who the hell does that? You pull a permit and it triggers a reassessment or it doesn't. Plus they re-evaluate every 2 or 3 years, depending on the state, and can see if any permits were pulled since the last assessment.I guess you could argue that he defrauded the tax payers by not reporting the improvements he made to the property to the tax assessor's office.
Permits usually trigger new evaluations for me, but I think there are technically rules about what you're supposed to report. Fraud is fraud,......right?Who the hell does that? You pull a permit and it triggers a reassessment or it doesn't. Plus they re-evaluate every 2 or 3 years, depending on the state, and can see if any permits were pulled since the last assessment.
If I pull the permits I've done everything that's legally required. So no, not fraud.Permits usually trigger new evaluations for me, but I think there are technically rules about what you're supposed to report. Fraud is fraud,......right?
Lol. *crickets*What evidence do you have that Stewart didn’t follow administrative rules on the work he did on his properties?
you guys have zero evidence Stewart committed fraud. But you’d rather try to smear him without evidence than deal with the actual evidence against trump. Typical. Are you a muppet or are you just playing the game?
LOLit's really the same thing, two sides of the same coin. Valuations while done by the accessors can be wildly off from valuations done by a citizen. I have multiple properties that have varying valuations, and you can make the argument that the accessor is giving favorable treatment to Jon Stewart, are we going after the accessor for that? @Sinister says jon updated his place, that would trigger valuation increases if done properly, but naw, they safe. I have a piece of land that is overvalued by the accessor by 100% (not a typo), aint nobody going to bat on my behalf, bank on that. On top of that, the idea that the bank, who deals with valuations for a living, is ok with Trump's valuation, says it all, it's a non issue, the idea that the bank is defrauded on valuation only comes into play on pitched plays/business startups, but actual property, dont buy it at all, especially a non issue since they were paid back.
Oh lordy this shit keeps bringing the laughs. The bottom shelf cope some people reach for
This fake controversy is the gift that keeps on giving. Way to go TS. LMAO
I think the burden is on you to explain why it's the same.chuds ITT mad about the jon stewart analogy and demand common sense.....can't explain or justify the case against trump.